Principles in Practice: The Blog of the Objective Standard
Friday, March 21, 2008
Free Speech vs. McCain and Company
Yaron Brook, director of the Ayn Rand Institute, has a timely and important op-ed in today’s Forbes.com titled “War On Free Political Speech,” in which he answers common arguments for campaign finance restrictions. Here are the opening paragraphs:
This presidential campaign will be, by far, the most expensive in U.S. history. And it is ironic that John McCain, the co-author of McCain-Feingold, is one of the candidates hustling to raise tens of millions of dollars. One thing is for sure: No matter who wins, the call for more campaign finance legislation will intensify--all in the name of combating the allegedly corrupting influence of money on politics. This is ominous, because what campaign finance restrictions actually do is subject political speech to the corrupting influence of government control.
Under current law, we are severely limited in how much we can donate to candidates, political parties and political committees. We are also subject to bans on radio and TV ads that might--crime of crimes--impact the victory or defeat of a candidate we favor or oppose. What justifies these restrictions on our freedom?
Without them, advocates say, the wealthy would control political speech. They would use their vast resources to promote their candidates while locking out those unable to run expensive ads. Americans would be left without access to the information necessary to make informed political decisions. Elected politicians would be beholden to rich financial backers, whom they'll have to pay off with special favors. The solution to this mess, the argument goes, is obvious: The government must "level the playing field" by limiting wealthy Americans' ability to use their money in the political debate.
But let us, as Ayn Rand so often advised, check our premises.
Read it all—and email it to your friends and associates. This is one of the most important political issues facing America today. How important is it? Freedom of speech is the defining characteristic of a society in which political change can occur peacefully.
Labels: Individual Rights and Law
PermaLink | Email this link to a friend | Write TOS about this post
Subscribe to the journal for people of reason.
Topics
- Announcements
- Ayn Rand and Objectivism
- Business and Economics
- Education
- Environmentalism
- Events
- Foreign Policy and War
- Healthcare
- History
- Individual Rights and Law
- Philosophy
- Psychology
- Religion
- Science and Technology
- The Arts
Blog Archive
- Recent Posts
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
Link to TOS
Place a TOS banner on your website or blog.
Blogroll
- Andrew Bostom
- Andrew Medworth
- Ari Armstrong
- Dollars & Crosses
- Forgotten Delights
- Galileo Blogs
- Geek Press
- Gus Van Horn
- NoodleFood
- Pedagogically Correct
- ReasonPharm
- Spark a Synapse
- Thrutch
- WoPSR
Sites of Interest
- AFCM
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Atlas Shrugged
- Ayn Rand Institute
- Ayn Rand Lexicon
- Capitalism Magazine
- Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism
- Climate Debate Daily
- Colorado Freedom Report
- FIRM
- Jihad Watch
- JunkScience.com
- MEMRI
- The Undercurrent
Humor
Blog Feed
Click the button below to subscribe to our blog's feed.
Get the Feed
Blogmarks
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Furl
NewsVine
RawSugar
Reddit
Simpy
StumbleUpon
TailRank
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
