Principles in Practice: The Blog of the Objective Standard
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
The Unjust Imprisonment of Dr. Jack Kevorkian
Irvine, CA—Assisted-suicide practitioner and advocate Jack Kevorkian will be paroled on June 1 after eight years of imprisonment for assisting in the suicide of a terminal patient suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease.
"Dr. Kevorkian's imprisonment was a great injustice," said Thomas Bowden, a practicing attorney and a writer for the Ayn Rand Institute. "He would never have been convicted of murder if Michigan law had allowed a defense based on irrefutable, objective evidence of consent. Dr. Kevorkian should be honored for his courageous stand in defense of the right of individuals suffering from devastating terminal diseases to end their lives with the assistance of a trusted doctor."
Before his conviction, Kevorkian claimed to have assisted in the suicide of 130 patients. Now he has vowed to work for the legalization of assisted suicide across the country while not practicing it himself.
"Hopefully," said Thomas Bowden, "Dr. Kevorkian will be successful nationwide in promoting the right to commit suicide with voluntary physician assistance. Currently, only Oregon has set forth clear procedures by which doctors can insulate themselves from criminal prosecution while easing their dying patients' pain and suffering."
"What lawmakers and judges must grasp," added Bowden, "is that there is no rational basis upon which the government can properly prevent an individual from choosing to end his own life. Our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness means that we need no one's permission to live, and that no one may forcibly obstruct our efforts to achieve personal happiness. But if happiness becomes impossible to attain, due to a dread disease or some other calamity, a person must be able to exercise the right to end his own life."
"To hold otherwise—to declare that society must give us permission to commit suicide—is to contradict the right to life at its root," said Bowden. "If we have a duty to go on living, despite our better judgment, then our lives do not belong to us, and we exist by permission, not by right.
"For these reasons, each individual has the right to decide the hour of his death and to implement that solemn decision as best he can. The choice is his because the life is his. And if a doctor is willing—not forced—to assist in the suicide, based on an objective assessment of his patient's mental and physical state, the law should not stand in his way."
Copyright © 2007 Ayn Rand® Institute. All rights reserved.
PermaLink | Email this link to a friend | Write TOS about this post
Subscribe to the journal for people of reason.
Blog Archive
- Recent Posts
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
Link to TOS
Place a TOS banner on your website or blog.
Blogroll
- Andrew Bostom
- Andrew Medworth
- Ari Armstrong
- Dollars & Crosses
- Forgotten Delights
- Galileo Blogs
- Geek Press
- Gus Van Horn
- NoodleFood
- Pedagogically Correct
- ReasonPharm
- Spark a Synapse
- Thrutch
- WoPSR
Sites of Interest
- AFCM
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Atlas Shrugged
- Ayn Rand Institute
- Ayn Rand Lexicon
- Capitalism Magazine
- Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism
- Climate Debate Daily
- Colorado Freedom Report
- FIRM
- Jihad Watch
- JunkScience.com
- MEMRI
- The Undercurrent
Humor
Blog Feed
Click the button below to subscribe to our blog's feed.
Get the Feed
Blogmarks
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Furl
NewsVine
RawSugar
Reddit
Simpy
StumbleUpon
TailRank
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
