Principles in Practice: The Blog of the Objective Standard
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Condemn the Power of Eminent Domain
Last years' United States Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. New London, which refused to prohibit local governments from using eminent domain to promote private economic development, has spawned a massive popular and legislative response at the state level. A comprehensive list of legislation pending, passed, or dead is available from the Institute for Justice's Castle Coalition website, as well as a report with a discussion of common "weasel words" in bills that may appear to reform the law but will in fact have little legal effect in constraining the power of eminent domain. Because the merit of much of this legislation is suspect, it is worth carefully reviewing legislation proposed in those states where multiple bills or popular referendums are pending, prior to next month's elections. The passage of nearly any such laws is of some value in registering popular support for property rights, but enactment of better variants of the proposed legislation is likely to lead to a steady stream of lawsuits which will keep the subject of property rights in the headlines for many years to come, which is to my mind a worthwhile result in itself. The more coverage the subject gets, the more time and opportunity are presented to intellectuals to speak to the issue of property rights in popular venues.
In my own state, California, at least nine separate bills were introduced in the state legislature and two popular initiatives were proposed. Unfortunately, only one initiative has made it to the ballot for next month's election: Proposition 90. Although it is among the weakest of the bills introduced, it nonetheless has the virtue of causing city planners to run scared that they may see some restraints put on their power to take private property for economic development. For those in the area of Orange County, California, the Federalist Society and Pacific Legal Foundation are sponsoring a legal conference this Friday at Chapman University featuring a debate over the Proposition and a symposium on the history of eminent domain.
Labels: Individual Rights and Law
PermaLink | Email this link to a friend | Write TOS about this post
Subscribe to the journal for people of reason.
Topics
- Announcements
- Ayn Rand and Objectivism
- Business and Economics
- Education
- Environmentalism
- Events
- Foreign Policy and War
- Healthcare
- History
- Individual Rights and Law
- Philosophy
- Psychology
- Religion
- Science and Technology
- The Arts
Blog Archive
- Recent Posts
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
Link to TOS
Place a TOS banner on your website or blog.
Blogroll
- Andrew Bostom
- Andrew Medworth
- Ari Armstrong
- Dollars & Crosses
- Forgotten Delights
- Galileo Blogs
- Geek Press
- Gus Van Horn
- NoodleFood
- Pedagogically Correct
- Politics without God
- ReasonPharm
- Robbservations
- Spark a Synapse
- Thrutch
- WoPSR
Sites of Interest
- AFCM
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Atlas Shrugged
- Ayn Rand Institute
- Ayn Rand Lexicon
- Capitalism Magazine
- Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism
- Climate Debate Daily
- Coalition for Secular Government
- Colorado Freedom Report
- FIRM
- Jihad Watch
- JunkScience.com
- MEMRI
- The Undercurrent
Humor
Blog Feed
Click the button below to subscribe to our blog's feed.
Get the Feed
Blogmarks
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Furl
NewsVine
RawSugar
Reddit
Simpy
StumbleUpon
TailRank
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
